Conflict in All My Sons Essays -- All My Sons Parent Child Relationshi

Conflict in All My Sons The conflict in the play All My Sons in embodied by two different sets of values. The aged propagation represented by Joe and Kate strongly believed in family values and Pursue of the American dream at any cost. In contradiction, Joe and Anne express the younger coevalss ethics and ideals clearly sh take in in the thoughts of idealism that money is not the most important thing in life. Even though the younger generations ideals are some propagation thought of as being irrational and in conflict with reality, all throughout the play their validity is greater. Many multiplication in parents-child relationships the parents have a very different view on things than the child they had raised. Most of these gaps are produced as a consequence of the different times they have grown in. In the play All My Sons the diversity between the two generations with two sets of ideals are mostly not a result of generation gap but a result of greediness and age. Many peop le when they are young see the world from a more optimistic dot of view and that is true for Chris and Anne. As people get old and have their own kids they are thought of to be more rational in their actions in order to protect their children. Joe Keller worked his whole life trying to create a better future for his sons, but at what cost? Arthur Millers main(prenominal) point in the play is that people should look beyond their inner circle of society. Joe chose to ignore whatever does not concern his little circle. Although optimism is clearly shown in Chris words his ideals are not to be mixed with dreams for they could be a reality. All throughout the play Chris is convincing people to believe in his reality. somewhat of them, the Doctor for example, believe that Chris is right and a life that is not so money centered is possible. Others, the Doctors wife for example, on the other hand, do no take Chris seriously because of his young age and poor experience in carrying out his own ideas. She expresses that by saying that Chris should go and work on his own before he preaches others. Her disagreement about her husband working in research is excused with a money issue. This shows the reader once again that the parent generation in this play, who are supposed to be representing the American Dream, chose to give up happiness for money. Do American ideals not include out of bounds of happiness? Chri... ...Even though her words express understanding more than agreement for Joe, she expresses no morals or any opinions for that matter. The reader would expect her to have her own tragic ending as well for through out the play she consists on the accompaniment that her life would come to an end if she finds out that Larry did in fact die. Different generation gaps may result in different ideas of curfew or bedtime but should not result in diverse ideas on humanity and morality, for these are universal issues that had always been in effect all through time. Tha t is why Kellers ideals are no more than an excuse to do bad things and because feel that what he has done was the right thing to do for it was all for his sons. The end of the play and the climax of finding out Keller was guilty in delivering the downcast cylinder heads are a push for Chris to practice his ideals and live on his own as appose to with his parents using his parents money. After this tragic moment for Chris when he finds out that everything he had believe in and protected were lies he started doubting his morals but the readers and the audience knows that he knows where the line of morality is and he would neer cross it.