every?Rockefeller Drug Laws? Essays -- essays research papers

Rockefeller Drug Laws     In May of 1973, New Yorks Governor, Nelson Rockefeller, made a set of stringent anti-drug laws for the state legislature. The consumption of these laws was to stop the drug abuse epidemic that was occurring in New York during the early 1970s. It was the most severe law in the landed estate the drug laws were to punish those who possessed and sold heavy cores of narcotics like cocain and heroine and to hold them in custody for the amount they possessed or sold. For example, if the mortal was caught with the possession of two or four ounces of drugs on them the minimum m in a federal prison would be 15 eld to life, no matter what historic period (if the withdrawender was of 15 years of age or older). Many problems began to occur concerning the laws, also there were many critiques concerning hold out or not it would work and be kept as a law.     The Rockefeller Drug Laws is still one of the most brutal drug la ws in the nation because of its ground breaking punishments. The laws state specifically that, the statutes require judge to impose a sentence of 15-years to life for anyone convicted of selling two ounces, or possessing four ounces of "narcotic drugs". This made it clear for all those that were dealing drugs that this was a no-nonsense rule. This was the beginning of up coming events in history that cut to protests and also very famous summits acquiree by family members of people in prison under the unfair ruling, friends and supports of those against the harsh laws to keep drugs off the streets.     The purpose of the laws was to provide protection and isolation from people who were not yet snarly with the drug epidemic. Also, it provided peace of mind for politicians that wanted to get the drug dealers off the streets permanently. For New York the drug war had just begun. Many people were for the bleak laws they saw drug dealing as if it were just like implementation because the death rate from narcotics at the cadence was increasingly high and the insecurity of the drugs being on the streets was worse. The consequences of these laws bear become even exaggeratedly ridiculous. In many cases a first time drug offender being charged under these laws can receive a higher sentencing past a person convicted of murder or rape. This meant that by possessing a kg of cocaine or... ...al job. I feel that not everyone that deals should be sentence to prison. however because a first time offender is carrying a certain amount of kilograms, they are sentences according to that. This is injustice because a person who may have committed other minor crimes may be charged the akin way as a person who made a dislocate for the first time. Besides that sentencing everyone that makes a crime is extremely expensive. People who dont have any type of connections with people who are empower in prison have to be paying money to swan them in prison.      As we all know, drug dealing is still termination on and it wont be stopping any time soon. As you have interpret, even though the Rockefeller Drug Laws had so practically demands upon it, still many continued to do it. In the article we read in class Criminal Justice through the looking Glass, or winning by losing illustrates how effective laws arent. one thing he says I will not go so far to say that the culpable justice policy has made no contribution to the drop in crime rates. Therefore, crime will always continue and what we should be curse about is how to help these individuals who are making these crimes.